4 Rules for Using Contingencies


In Part 1 of this article, I discussed what Real Estate Contract Contingencies are, as well as defined the most common contingencies used in real estate purchase contracts.

In this article, I want to discuss the 4 rules for using contingencies (or not) to improve your investing success…

First, let me start with the the first and most important rule of using contingencies when making offers:

  • Rule #1: The fewer contingencies used in your offer, the more attractive your offer will be to the Seller.

Perhaps this is obvious; perhaps not. Let’s look at it from the perspective of the Seller:

He wants to sell his property as quickly and as efficiently as possible, and any contingencies you put in your offer is an opportunity for you to back out of the deal before it closes.

So, as a Buyer, you want to limit your contingencies to only those that are absolutely necessary. I’m certainly not saying to never use a contingency — sometimes they’re very important — but don’t use more than necessary to protect your interests. And, if you have the ability to use no contingencies in your offer, that’s makes your offer much stronger than any competing offers.

Of course, unless you have had the property inspected (or have done it yourself) and are absolutely sure that you want to move forward, you take a risk by not have a contingency in your offer.

So what I recommend for most people is:

  • Rule #2: If possible, limit your offer to a single contingency.

While it may be more reassuring to you to have lots of contingencies in your offer — it means you have more leeway to change your mind, right! — the truth is, that a single contingency often provides all the protect you need. In fact, for 80% of the offers I make, the only contingency I use is the Inspection Contingency (the other 20% of the offers I have no contingencies at all).

The inspection contingency will give me a fixed period of time — generally 5-10 days, depending on how much I think I need — to get everything in order to ensure that I want to — and can — buy the property. During that inspection period, I will get my property inspection completed, I will ensure that I have my financing lined up, I will create my Scope of Work, I will have my contractors come out to the property to give me bids, I’ll contact my insurance agent to get quotes, etc.

By the time I’ve used up that inspection period, I’m pretty sure of whether I’m ready to move forward on this property or not. If I’ve come across anything concerning (structural issues, mold, missed repair costs, etc), I might go back to the seller to request a lower price, and worst case, I might back out of the deal.

Which brings me to Rule #3:

  • Rule #3: Only execute a contingency if absolutely necessary.

I know plenty of investors who will make lots and lots of offers, each with contingencies. They won’t even bother looking at the properties unless they get their contract accepted. While this is a perfectly reasonable way to make lots of offers in a short period of time, it also increases the probability that you’ll end up having to back out of one or more of those offers using your contingency.

Perhaps you find that there is more repair work than you needed. Or maybe you find that there is structural issue that will be costly to fix. Or maybe you determine the layout of the property will make it difficult to sell. Regardless, if you’re not careful, you’ll find yourself backing out of deals.

And if you back out of too many deals, you run the risk of getting a bad reputation. If you work with the same listing agents over and over (for example, if you buy REO properties), and you have a reputation for backing out of deals using your contingencies, you’ll find that you start getting many fewer offers accepted. Remember, Sellers are interested in getting rid of their property as quickly and efficiently as possible, and if they think you’re just going to waste their time by backing out of the deal, they won’t even bother to accept your offers.

If you intend to use your contingency, consider alternative uses:

  • Rule #4: Contingencies can be negotiating tools.

Just because you find that the deal isn’t working out for you, doesn’t mean that you need to use your contingency to back out. You can use that contingency to reopen negotiations with the seller instead.

For example, let’s say that during your inspection you find that there are some major plumbing issues in the property that will require an extra $3000 in plumbing work that you hadn’t factored in. Instead of using your contingency to back out of the deal, use it as an opportunity to ask the Seller to drop his price by $3000. Not only do you keep the deal alive, but the Seller would likely face the same issue with the next buyer, so one way or the other, he’s going to end up eating that $3000 cost.

Or, let’s say your financing falls through — instead of using the contingency to back out of the deal, perhaps you can use it to reopen negotiations around seller financing, especially if the Seller is a bank.

The key is that even when you use a contingency, you don’t have to use it to back out of the deal; you can instead use it to revisit the original deal and try to come to a reasonable compromise that resolves the issue(s) and makes both parties happy.

3 responses to “4 Rules for Using Contingencies”

  1. Terry H. says:

    I’ve always felt this way about my contracts and deals with home owners. Using your tools to solve a problem will close more deals with less leads! Thanks for sharing.

  2. Aly L. says:

    Excellent advice, as always. Always try to work it out instead of quitting.

  3. Jerome says:

    Nice post. I like the last point – contingencies can be negotiation tools. never thought of it that way. Cheers!

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *